Morro Bay considers skipping November election

Morro Bay is weighing whether to cancel its Nov. 3 municipal election entirely after just three candidates filed for three open seats — a move that would save the coastal city roughly $30,000 but that some residents argue would strip voters of a fundamental right.
The New Times SLO (Atascadero) first reported that an Aug. 19 staff report from Morro Bay city staff recommended the City Council cancel the election and instead appoint the three candidates running unopposed: Mayor Carla Wixom, who is seeking a two-year term, and council candidates Mike Gerson and Zara Landrum, who are vying for two four-year seats.
The city budgeted $30,000 for the election, and staff estimate that canceling it would cut Morro Bay's direct costs to approximately $250 — a near-total savings driven by the absence of any other city ballot measures this cycle.
How the process got here
The Morro Bay City Council called the election in June for one two-year mayoral term and two four-year council seats, according to the New Times report. Candidate nominations opened July 13 and closed Aug. 7 for the mayor's race. The filing period for the council seats was extended through Aug. 12 after an incumbent chose not to seek reelection to one of the open seats.
When nominations closed, Wixom was the sole candidate for mayor, and Gerson and Landrum were the only candidates for the two available council seats.
Under California election law, when the number of qualified candidates does not exceed the number of offices up for election, a city council may appoint those candidates to office rather than place their names before voters. The council also retains the option to hold the election anyway.
Wixom told New Times before the Aug. 19 meeting that the unusual situation presents an opportunity to avoid spending an estimated $25,000 to $30,000 on races without challengers.
"Since the candidates are running uncontested, there is an opportunity for the council to withdraw from the ballot, as we have no other city ballot measures," Wixom said.
This isn't the first time Morro Bay has faced this scenario. Wixom noted that two years ago, three candidates also ran uncontested — but because a city ballot measure still had to go before voters that year, the appointment option wasn't available.
Residents push back: 'Our right of choice'
Not everyone in Morro Bay is on board with skipping the ballot box. Several residents urged the council to proceed with the election anyway, arguing that casting a vote serves a purpose beyond choosing between competing candidates.
Morro Bay resident Ruth Ann Angus wrote to the council on Aug. 18, saying that while some government positions lend themselves to appointment, elected offices are different.
"In government, certain positions do lend themselves to appointment; however, positions such as mayor and council are meant to be accomplished by a vote of the people," Angus wrote. "Without your names on the ballot you deprive me and the voting citizens of Morro Bay our right of choice regardless if that choice is only for one person running for a position."
Another resident, Betty Winholtz, argued in her own letter that keeping the races on the ballot would allow voters to signal their support — or lack of it — for candidates who are otherwise guaranteed to take office. She described the uncontested vote as a form of a "vote of confidence," and noted that canceling the election would eliminate the possibility of a write-in challenger emerging if circumstances change before November.
Others raised concerns about losing candidate statements in the county voter information guide — particularly given that one new council member is poised to take office.
"I happen to know Mike Gerson since he is a brother in Rotary," Angus wrote. "However, my neighbors do not know him, and I assume many people in this community are not acquainted with him. We would like to hear from him."
Wixom said candidate statements would remain available online regardless of whether the election moves forward.
Who are the candidates?
Gerson is the only non-incumbent among the three. A Morro Bay resident of more than 20 years and a local business owner, he serves on the Morro Bay Maritime Museum board and the Lighted Boat Parade committee. In his candidate statement, he highlighted fiscal responsibility, public safety, and preserving Morro Bay's character as his priorities, according to the New Times report.
Wixom, the incumbent mayor, is seeking a two-year term. Landrum is running for one of the two four-year council seats.
Why it matters for Atascadero and the 805
For readers in Atascadero and across the North County, Morro Bay's dilemma is more than a coastal curiosity — it's a live example of a budget-and-democracy tradeoff that small California cities increasingly confront. Running a standalone municipal election is expensive, and when races draw no challengers, councils must decide whether tens of thousands of taxpayer dollars are best spent confirming a foregone conclusion.
The appointment route is fully legal under state law and used periodically across California when candidate fields are thin. But the resident objections in Morro Bay illustrate the counterargument: elections function not only to select leaders but to inform voters, introduce new officeholders to the public, and provide a formal check — even a symbolic one — on those seeking power.
Morro Bay residents and observers can follow the outcome through the city's official meeting agenda and staff report, the primary documents underlying the recommendation. The decision rests with the City Council, which could confirm the appointments, proceed with the Nov. 3 election, or take other action consistent with state election law.
Whatever the council decides must be resolved in time for San Luis Obispo County election officials to prepare — or stand down from — the November ballot, meaning the clock is running on a choice that will define how roughly $30,000 in public funds and three seats of municipal leadership are settled this fall.
Reported by 805.life
Researched and written drawing on primary sources. Additional reporting: New Times SLO (Atascadero).
City
AtascaderoAdditional Reporting
New Times SLO (Atascadero)Published
August 20, 2026
Reported and written by 805.life
Explore AtascaderoAll Atascadero NewsMore News from Atascadero
AtascaderoSLO firefighters’ union files unfair practice charge against city
Heads up, neighbors — the San Luis Obispo firefighters' union has filed an unfair practice charge with the state, saying the city and City Attorney Christine Dietrick slapped an unlawful gag order on them. The complaint, filed Aug. 31, claims that violates the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act, the law governing labor talks in California cities. Why should Atascadero care? Because this isn't just an SLO issue. Every Central Coast city — ours included — operates under the same rules, and how this plays out could shape how much our own first responders can say when they're worried about staffing, safety, or how taxpayer money gets spent. Firefighters are the folks we trust when things go sideways; quieting them isn't a great look. We'll be watching how PERB rules. New Times SLO (Atascadero) has the full story, and we'll keep you posted on what it means for the 805.
AtascaderoSan Miguel receives $1 million in federal funding for new Emergency Operations Center
Good news for our North County neighbors: San Miguel just landed over $1 million in federal funding for a brand-new Emergency Operations Center. Rep. Jimmy Panetta made the announcement on Sept. 29 alongside San Miguel Fire Chief Scott Young and Assemblymember Dawn Addis, and honestly, this couldn't come at a better time. As San Miguel keeps growing, having a dedicated hub for emergency response isn't just a nice-to-have — it's essential. When fires, floods, or quakes hit our stretch of the 805, every minute and every coordinated resource counts. This center means faster, smarter responses that protect families from San Miguel all the way down to Atascadero. It's always encouraging to see federal dollars flowing into our small Central Coast communities. Thanks to New Times SLO (Atascadero) for keeping us in the loop on this one.
AtascaderoPismo Beach City Council adopts new resolution to rename park after Brown Act cure and correct request
Pismo Beach leaders met Sept. 29 to take a second run at renaming South Palisades Park after sitting Councilmember Mary Ann Reiss, approving the resolution 4-0 with Reiss abstaining. The redo came after a Brown Act cure-and-correct request, meaning the council had to fix a procedural hiccup from its earlier vote. Same outcome, cleaner process. We know these do-overs well here in Atascadero — when a board gets the process wrong, the fix is a fresh vote, not a fight. New Times SLO (Atacadero's own) flagged the special meeting, and honestly, it's a good reminder that even small civic gestures have rules behind them. Naming a park for a sitting councilmember is a rare honor, and doing it by the book matters. Whether you drive down to Pismo or just follow 805 politics, the lesson holds: procedure protects the outcome.