Morro Bay considers skipping November election

Morro Bay is weighing whether to cancel its Nov. 3 municipal election entirely after just three candidates filed for three open seats — a move that would save the coastal city roughly $30,000 but that some residents argue would strip voters of a fundamental right.
The New Times SLO (Atascadero) first reported that an Aug. 19 staff report from Morro Bay city staff recommended the City Council cancel the election and instead appoint the three candidates running unopposed: Mayor Carla Wixom, who is seeking a two-year term, and council candidates Mike Gerson and Zara Landrum, who are vying for two four-year seats.
The city budgeted $30,000 for the election, and staff estimate that canceling it would cut Morro Bay's direct costs to approximately $250 — a near-total savings driven by the absence of any other city ballot measures this cycle.
How the process got here
The Morro Bay City Council called the election in June for one two-year mayoral term and two four-year council seats, according to the New Times report. Candidate nominations opened July 13 and closed Aug. 7 for the mayor's race. The filing period for the council seats was extended through Aug. 12 after an incumbent chose not to seek reelection to one of the open seats.
When nominations closed, Wixom was the sole candidate for mayor, and Gerson and Landrum were the only candidates for the two available council seats.
Under California election law, when the number of qualified candidates does not exceed the number of offices up for election, a city council may appoint those candidates to office rather than place their names before voters. The council also retains the option to hold the election anyway.
Wixom told New Times before the Aug. 19 meeting that the unusual situation presents an opportunity to avoid spending an estimated $25,000 to $30,000 on races without challengers.
"Since the candidates are running uncontested, there is an opportunity for the council to withdraw from the ballot, as we have no other city ballot measures," Wixom said.
This isn't the first time Morro Bay has faced this scenario. Wixom noted that two years ago, three candidates also ran uncontested — but because a city ballot measure still had to go before voters that year, the appointment option wasn't available.
Residents push back: 'Our right of choice'
Not everyone in Morro Bay is on board with skipping the ballot box. Several residents urged the council to proceed with the election anyway, arguing that casting a vote serves a purpose beyond choosing between competing candidates.
Morro Bay resident Ruth Ann Angus wrote to the council on Aug. 18, saying that while some government positions lend themselves to appointment, elected offices are different.
"In government, certain positions do lend themselves to appointment; however, positions such as mayor and council are meant to be accomplished by a vote of the people," Angus wrote. "Without your names on the ballot you deprive me and the voting citizens of Morro Bay our right of choice regardless if that choice is only for one person running for a position."
Another resident, Betty Winholtz, argued in her own letter that keeping the races on the ballot would allow voters to signal their support — or lack of it — for candidates who are otherwise guaranteed to take office. She described the uncontested vote as a form of a "vote of confidence," and noted that canceling the election would eliminate the possibility of a write-in challenger emerging if circumstances change before November.
Others raised concerns about losing candidate statements in the county voter information guide — particularly given that one new council member is poised to take office.
"I happen to know Mike Gerson since he is a brother in Rotary," Angus wrote. "However, my neighbors do not know him, and I assume many people in this community are not acquainted with him. We would like to hear from him."
Wixom said candidate statements would remain available online regardless of whether the election moves forward.
Who are the candidates?
Gerson is the only non-incumbent among the three. A Morro Bay resident of more than 20 years and a local business owner, he serves on the Morro Bay Maritime Museum board and the Lighted Boat Parade committee. In his candidate statement, he highlighted fiscal responsibility, public safety, and preserving Morro Bay's character as his priorities, according to the New Times report.
Wixom, the incumbent mayor, is seeking a two-year term. Landrum is running for one of the two four-year council seats.
Why it matters for Atascadero and the 805
For readers in Atascadero and across the North County, Morro Bay's dilemma is more than a coastal curiosity — it's a live example of a budget-and-democracy tradeoff that small California cities increasingly confront. Running a standalone municipal election is expensive, and when races draw no challengers, councils must decide whether tens of thousands of taxpayer dollars are best spent confirming a foregone conclusion.
The appointment route is fully legal under state law and used periodically across California when candidate fields are thin. But the resident objections in Morro Bay illustrate the counterargument: elections function not only to select leaders but to inform voters, introduce new officeholders to the public, and provide a formal check — even a symbolic one — on those seeking power.
Morro Bay residents and observers can follow the outcome through the city's official meeting agenda and staff report, the primary documents underlying the recommendation. The decision rests with the City Council, which could confirm the appointments, proceed with the Nov. 3 election, or take other action consistent with state election law.
Whatever the council decides must be resolved in time for San Luis Obispo County election officials to prepare — or stand down from — the November ballot, meaning the clock is running on a choice that will define how roughly $30,000 in public funds and three seats of municipal leadership are settled this fall.
Reported by 805.life
Researched and written drawing on primary sources. Additional reporting: New Times SLO (Atascadero).
City
AtascaderoAdditional Reporting
New Times SLO (Atascadero)Published
August 20, 2026
Reported and written by 805.life
Explore AtascaderoAll Atascadero NewsMore News from Atascadero
AtascaderoSLO County pays into renewed statewide coalition to combat offshore oil drilling
Remember the good old days when the biggest worry off our coast was whether the fog would burn off by noon? Well, our supervisors just made sure it stays that way. At their Aug. 18 meeting, the SLO County Board of Supervisors voted to chip into a renewed statewide coalition—the same one that fought off offshore drilling back in the Reagan era. It's been dormant for over 30 years, but with the feds eyeing our waters again, it's time to rally the troops. For us here in Atascadero, this might feel like a coastal issue, but it's not. Our creeks, our aquifers, and our small-town way of life are all tied to that ocean. A spill wouldn't just ruin Morro Bay's views—it'd ripple through our tourism, our fishing, and our local businesses. So kudos to the board for spending a few bucks to keep the big oil rigs away. It's a small price for peace of mind. Thanks to New Times SLO (Atascadero) for keeping us in the loop.
AtascaderoThree candidates vie for Paso Robles 2nd District seat
Paso Robles voters in the 2nd District have a real choice this November, and it’s about time. For the past four years, Councilmember Chris Bausch has been at the center of a storm at City Hall—one that ended with lawsuits and over $840,000 in settlements and legal costs. That’s a lot of taxpayer money, and it’s weighed on the community. Now, Bausch is asking for another term, but he’s not running unopposed this time. Two challengers are stepping up, and that’s a healthy sign for local democracy. For those of us in the 805, this race is more than just a council seat—it’s about how we want our local government to work. The Central Coast is tight-knit, and when a council race gets this contentious, it echoes beyond Paso Robles. New Times SLO (Atascadero) has been covering the fallout, and it’s worth paying attention to. Whoever wins will have to rebuild trust and focus on the basics: roads, water, housing, and keeping our small-town feel. If you live in the 2nd District, this is your chance to weigh in—don’t sleep on it.
AtascaderoCannabis tax increase relief comes after summer increase
Good news for local farmers: the county is rolling back the cannabis cultivation tax from 8 percent back to 6 percent this fall, just months after the increase took effect. Growers across the North County, including many in and around Atascadero, had told supervisors that the automatic bump was squeezing an industry already dealing with falling prices and tight margins. The Board of Supervisors listened and passed an ordinance on Aug. 4 to ease that burden—a rare bit of relief in what's been a tough season for the greenhouses and fields that dot our hills. This matters beyond the growers themselves. Cannabis is one of the biggest economic engines in SLO County, and when cultivators struggle, it ripples through local jobs, equipment suppliers, and even the tax revenue that funds county services. Atascadero residents might not see the change directly, but keeping local farms viable helps preserve our rural character and the open spaces we love. The New Times SLO (Atascadero) report notes the rollback takes effect this fall, so if you're in the industry, watch for the lower rate on your next filing. For the rest of us, it's a small but meaningful sign that local government can pivot when businesses speak up.